Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
IV quartile of IL-6 is shown in Table 1.
In the highest quartile of polychlorinated biphenyls (ΣPCB) it was more than 2-fold increased (Relative risk [RR] I vs. IV quartile, 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-5.7), but no dose-response relation was apparent.
The observed increased breast cancer risk associated with exposure to dieldrin derived from women who developed an estrogen receptor negative (ERN) tumor (Odds ratio [OR] I vs. IV quartile, 7.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.4-46.1, p-value for linear trend 0.01).
Similar(55)
Survival analyses for highest (versus lowest) DPP-IV quartile showed no greater risk of diabetes (HR 0.88 [95% CI 0.62 1.24], P = 0.46, when minimally adjusted, and 0.90 [0.58–1.40], P = 0.64, when fully adjusted).
This increased risk was confined exclusively to the TCDD quartile IV.
However, the quartile IV showed an increased risk that was not statistically significant when compared with the referent category, but it was statistically significant if the comparison veterans were not used as the referent group and TCDD was treated as a continuous variable (Table 3).
CA-BSI: Catheter-associated bloodstream infections; CDC Centerss for disease control and prevention; CVC: Central venous catheter; IQR Interr quartile range; IV: Intra venous; ITS: Interrupted time series.
Individuals in the highest quartile of DPP-IV were not at greater risk of diabetes (hazard ratio 0.88 [95% CI 0.62 1.24]) in Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for age, sex, race, study center, and multiple additional diabetes risk factors.
Patients were split evenly into four quartiles, determined by daily IV FA.
The p values are derived from testing the difference in means of those with BMI Z quartiles I-III vs. IV.
Patients with stage III and stage IV disease had lost a median 9.5% (inter-quartile range, 4.3 16.0%) of their total body weight by the time of diagnosis compared with patients with stage I and II disease (median weight loss, 1.4%; inter-quartile range, 0 7.3%).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com