Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
It seems clear that having a property often amounts to having a certain causal power and in some cases the only informative things we can say about a property are what powers (capacities) it confers on its instances.
It then draws the conclusion that a universal cannot be the substance of all of its instances (for it could not be idion to all of them), and concludes that it must be the substance "of none".
Once you've found the culprit, delete it & all its instances and click "Send/Receive" once again.
MyPHRMachines does not prevent pushing hospital- or patient-generated data to one of its instances, nor does it prevent patients from sharing data with their trusted caregivers.
Some philosophers believe that the causal powers that a property confers on its instances are essential to it.
In its general form it clearly has no substantive answer, but its instances can yield modest and useful questions.
The thing with which it is uniquely correlated, and of which it is the substance, is not one of its instances, but is the substantial form itself.
Goodman claims that, if a generalization is accidental (and so not lawlike), then it is not capable of receiving confirmation from one of its instances.
Many take it that a relation of instantiation holds between a property and its instances.
Realization can be described in terms of dependence; e.g., for a particular physiological event-type to realize pain is for it to be such that in virtue of its physiological organization, its instances play the pain-role.
Like any example of the genre, ours was not without its instances of farce.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com