"iterative evaluation" is a valid and commonly used phrase in written English.
It refers to the process of continuously examining and assessing something in order to make improvements or adjustments over time. It can be used in various contexts, such as project management, product development, or data analysis. Example: The team conducted an iterative evaluation of their project, gathering feedback from stakeholders and making necessary changes to improve its effectiveness.
An agglomerate hierarchical clustering-based iterative evaluation algorithm is designed for iteratively eliminating occupancy diversity.
Iterative evaluation of a web-based health information resource.
The success of these efforts will require journals and funders to adopt guidelines and support the community's iterative evaluation and improvement cycle.
Users can flexibly create new networks based on proposed designs or edit existing networks, making iterative evaluation simple and intuitive.
This network allowed iterative evaluation and refinement of LUPAS for scenario analysis on technical and policy changes.
Because the cost-effectiveness of a PCV program could be affected by potential serotype replacement or herd immunity effects that may not be known until after a large scale introduction, type-specific surveillance and iterative evaluation will be critical.
Expert inductor designers rely on iterative evaluations with electromagnetic simulators, which, properly configured, are able to yield a highly accurate performance evaluation.
Phased approaches, also referred to as "tiered" or "iterative" evaluations, are commonly used in risk assessments as a means to balance resources against the desire to reduce uncertainty in the assessments.
In fact, the development process relied to large extent on the input of the UWG as well as the iterative evaluations to define the portal for non health professionals.
A run-time database of previously evaluated state points is implemented to improve initial guesses for iterative property evaluation, reducing property evaluation time by 45% in a representative study.
When consensus was not achieved, a new session was held for a total of three iterative independent evaluation sessions; at each subsequent session, physicians were provided with their previous score as well as with the blinded evaluation of the other participants.
