Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(46)
The items were selected from 50 potential candidates by a selection panel identifying ten items considered critical for all of the systems under test.
Methods: Ten universal and 9 pediatric-sized items were selected from the World Health Organization's Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care.
The feature items were selected from well-known tools such as spectral information, wavelet extrema across several decomposition levels, and local statistical variations of the waveform.
In developing the OSAB 40 items were selected from a pool of 82 and distributed among the following a priori scales: Irritation/anger, Anxiety/gloominess, Aggressive behavior, Antecedent (to aggressive behavior), Sanction (for aggressive behavior) and Social behavior.
The 20 items were selected from previously validated depression scales.
These items were selected from Hungarian legal documents (such as the 8/2013 Decree of the Ministry of Economics) describing what knowledge components vocational education teachers must possess at the end of their training.
Similar(14)
Items are selected from multiple sources ([38, 39], and own design).
During testing, the items are selected from these "bags" based on to the currently estimated skill level (Reckase, 2010).
Whereas initial customer features for this study's release backlog are created based on information in release roadmaps, Scum's release backlog items are selected from the product backlog for the current release.
Items are selected from a large item bank, based on the patient's previous answer.
A predominantly inattentive type (ADHD-PI) is diagnosed when at least six items are selected from the inattentive-disorganized dimension; a predominantly hyperactive impulsive type (ADHD-PH) is diagnosed when at least six items are selected from the hyperactive impulsive dimension; and a combined type (ADHD-C) is diagnosed when at least six items are selected from each of the two dimensions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com