Sentence examples for items were presented with from inspiring English sources

The four items were presented with the response options: strongly disagree, somewhat disagree, somewhat agree, strongly agree, dont know/ not sure, or refused to answer; and items except traffic safety for bicycling were reverse scored.

However, when the target items were presented with distractors, the results were in the opposite direction: items that were later remembered but without correct source information tended to show more decreased activity than items with correct source information.

The projects differed in the item allocation and nature of the cues as follows: In the Tavistock project, the 200 items were divided as follows: 100 treated items: 50 with phonological cues and 50 with orthographic cues 100 control items matched with 100 treated items All items were presented with a choice of cues [ 1].

At the beginning of each sequence a new target item was presented with the word 'target', subsequent to which presentation of objects began.

Each item is presented with a photograph showing its provenance.

For the output task, one item is presented with one food item and they have to produce the affect symbolized by the smiley.

At the beginning of each sequence a new target item was presented with the word 'target' for 3400 ms. Subsequent to the target stimulus being defined, presentation of the sequence of targets and distractors began.

On the other hand, left posterior hippocampal activity was noted for source memory formation only when the target item was presented with a distractor.

In the MTL, activity in the left collateral sulcus extended to the parahippocampal cortex also showed greater encoding activity for source correct items than source incorrect items regardless of whether the target item was presented with or without a distractor.

Additionally, in Part 2 of the survey each item was presented with a visual (bar graph) and statistical (median and interquartile range (IQR)) summary of its quantitative Round 2 ratings.

Figure 3 illustrates the average peristimulus time histograms for individual items included in the different blocks of Fig. 2. The change in activity during PA is tonic, sustained throughout the 1s the item is presented with a small reduction during the interstimulus interval.