Items were presented randomly mixed and the presentation order was different for each subject.
After a general presentation of the tool, items were presented and discussed one by one.
Old items were presented at 2, 8 or 16 words following the first presentation.
He compared two formats: (1) items were presented in the order question, text, options, and (2) items were presented in the order question, text, question, options.
Targets and non-target items were presented at different within-trial positions.
Upon exceeding a predefined checklist threshold value, the following items were presented.
The items were presented on a seven-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 7 = strongly agree).
All survey items were presented in the respondents' native language (German).
The items were presented in the following order: duck, scissors, rock, booby, nutcracker, and stalagmite.
The items were presented in a pseudo-randomised sequence, with six trials per item and 18 trials per cat.
Items were presented five times: each time they made reference to a different kind of tool (online courses, hypertexts, Web forums, multimedia presentations, and virtual simulations).
