Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(30)
Results: The audit of the old bags showed that only 27%% of items were present in all 3 bags, that there was no standardised kit list, and that some items were out of date.
Some of these items were present in more than one network.
Large increases in overall numbers of published items were present.
All 'strongly recommended' items were present in some form but full information was missing in four of them (table 1).
The rule was that 'for a given subject, at least s of the n items were present'.
Participating organisations already used the questionnaire as a checklist to ascertain whether several quality management items were present.
Similar(30)
Items were presented randomly mixed and the presentation order was different for each subject.
After a general presentation of the tool, items were presented and discussed one by one.
Old items were presented at 2, 8 or 16 words following the first presentation.
Study participants were separated into three groups and six items were presented to them in a classroom setting.
Targets and non-target items were presented at different within-trial positions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com