Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
items were damaged
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "items were damaged" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing a situation where physical goods have been harmed or impaired in some way. Example: "Upon inspection, we found that several items were damaged during shipping."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Wiki
Science
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
No items were damaged".
News & Media
When Occupy Wall Street was evicted protesters complained that books and other items were damaged by police.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
(Some of the items are damaged or irregular).
News & Media
During transportation no items are damaged, i.e., the amount of received items in destination is the same as the one sent from sources.
(ii) During transportation no items are damaged, i.e., the amount of received items in destination is the same as the one sent from sources. .
When food is limited or brood items are damaged, brood may be eaten by workers [ 29, 31] and thus the nutritional value of these items would be recycled.
Science
It's also a good idea to get bonded to prove to clients that you are trustworthy and are covered in the event that items are damaged, destroyed, or stolen.
Wiki
If an item is damaged, contact the vendor immediately.
Wiki
These should include the sum, interest rate and durations of a loan, as well as what the procedure is in the event an item is damaged or lost.
Wiki
Mr. Joslin asked the moving company to take away high-value items that were damaged, and, a day later, called in Dumpsters and mobile storage units to hold ruined items (one lesson he learned last year from Hurricane Irene was not to throw anything out until the insurance company had seen it).
News & Media
The online greeting card and gift firm was bombarded with complaints about items that were damaged, late or failed to arrive.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When documenting damage for insurance claims or legal purposes, be specific about which "items were damaged", the nature of the damage, and the estimated value of each item.
Common error
Avoid using only the phrase "items were damaged" without detailing which specific items suffered damage. Always provide a clear list or description to prevent misunderstandings or disputes.
Source & Trust
77%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "items were damaged" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that certain objects (items) have undergone some form of harm or impairment. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is usable in written English to describe damage to physical goods.
Frequent in
News & Media
34%
Wiki
31%
Science
19%
Less common in
Formal & Business
5%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "items were damaged" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to describe physical harm to goods or possessions. As Ludwig AI validates, it's suitable for various writing contexts. While it appears frequently in News & Media, Wiki, and Scientific sources, its usage is generally neutral and can extend to both formal and informal communications. For effective use, remember to specify the affected items and damage details, avoiding vagueness. Alternatives like "goods sustained damage" or "products incurred damage" can offer a more formal tone.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
goods sustained damage
Replaces "items" with "goods" and "were damaged" with "sustained damage", resulting in a more formal tone.
products incurred damage
Substitutes "items" with "products" and "were damaged" with "incurred damage", indicating damage as a result of a process or event.
merchandise was harmed
Changes "items" to "merchandise" to focus on things being sold or transported, while using "was harmed" instead of "were damaged".
articles suffered damage
Replaces "items" with "articles" for a more generic reference to things and uses "suffered damage" to suggest an adverse impact.
belongings got ruined
Uses "belongings" to refer to personal possessions, with "got ruined" offering a less formal substitute for "were damaged".
property was impaired
Replaces "items" with "property" to describe things that are owned or possessed and uses "was impaired" for a more formal and technical tone.
commodities were affected
Changes "items" to "commodities" to emphasize items of trade and replaces "were damaged" with "were affected", broadening the impact beyond physical harm.
possessions were spoiled
Uses "possessions" to focus on ownership and replaces "were damaged" with "were spoiled", often implying the damage is such that something is no longer useful.
effects were compromised
Changes "items" to "effects" to refer to personal belongings, while "were compromised" suggests the items' integrity or function has been diminished.
assets were depreciated
Substitutes "items" with "assets", focusing on things of value, and uses "were depreciated" to suggest a loss of value due to the damage.
FAQs
What can I say instead of "items were damaged"?
You can use alternatives like "goods sustained damage", "products incurred damage", or "merchandise was harmed" depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "items were damaged"?
Yes, "items were damaged" is grammatically correct. It uses the passive voice to describe that the items received damage, without specifying who or what caused it.
What is the difference between "items were damaged" and "items are damaged"?
"Items were damaged" indicates that the damage occurred in the past, whereas "items are damaged" suggests that the damage is present at the time of speaking.
What does "items were damaged" mean in the context of shipping?
In shipping, "items were damaged" means that some or all of the goods being shipped have been harmed or impaired during transit. This can lead to insurance claims or requests for refunds.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
77%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested