Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Based on patient feedback (see below), translations of three Danish, two German and five French items were corrected.
Similar(59)
Results revealed that 85% of the 384 intake estimates for the simulated food items were correct (Cohen's κ=0.80, P<.001).
Seventy per cent of items were correct targets and 30% were foils.
Then, the subjects had to choose which items were correct and this behavioral choice of correct answers was compared to their own hedonic responses.
How good is your grammar? is full of tests and questions to test your English skills, from how to deal with contractions to whether the names of common household items are correct.
Specifically, to determine whether the trajectory of change predicts outcome status, and whether the current hierarchical order of WHIM items is correct for this context.
You will score zero, even if all four items are correct.
Descriptive statistics were calculated for item scores and total scale scores (reversed item scores were corrected before total scale score calculation; a minimum of 17 valid responses was required).
Mean scores were calculated for each scale (reversed item scores were corrected before mean scale score calculation; for each scale valid responses were required to a minimum of 80%% of items to calculate a mean score).
All correlations were corrected for item overlap.
These items have been corrected.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com