Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
These items were considered separately.
Three items were considered unacceptable, and one of them was identified as a potentially problematic item.
These items were considered for the new pre-selected item set (N = 60).
The remaining items were considered to substantively require both elevation and shape.
User evaluation disclosed that 80% of the generated items were considered as suitable (Hoshino & Nakagawa, 2007).
Those without improvement of at least one-third in the two items were considered as nonresponders.
All items were considered relevant to most patients in both groups.
Out of the 43 items in the questionnaire, 32 items were considered validated with coefficient alpha >0.70.
Responses of "moderate", "severe' and "very" for the ISI symptom items were considered presence of an insomnia symptom.
Items were considered to be part of a factor if their primary loading was on that factor.
Participants who responded positively to two or more screening items and five or more total items were considered to have anxiety.
More suggestions(17)
articles were considered
themes were considered
papers were considered
lines were considered
contents were considered
subjects were considered
property were considered
items were considered necessary
item were considered
items were deliberate
section were considered
article were considered
items are viewed as
items were checked
materials were considered
items were sent
items were used
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com