Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Selected items were collated for all individuals invited to either cancer screening programme.
Similar(59)
The frequency of observation for each item was collated and mapped against the RCP criteria and the item groupings proposed by Schnakers et al. 20 Item frequency within each of the PDOC diagnostic groups at discharge (VS, MCS−, MCS+) was then used to examine and revise the hierarchical order of the items.
The raw data of items identified by students were collated in a tabular format bringing the data from each year group together.
The second round sought responses to the relative importance of each item, which were rated as: Responses were collated as frequency per response category.
Each item was costed at 2008 prices, which were collated from financial records at each hospital.
Items found in the literature but not in the interviews were collated (n = 26).
Descriptive results were collated.
So V4I went out and set up "listening posts" to collate feedback, and 726 responses were collated into a report.
Influential instances were collated here.
Both physiological scores and an operative severity score were collated.
Results were collated on an excel spreadsheet and analysed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com