Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Fourteen items were assessed in the HuGE articles published in 2006.
This leads to personality scores for individuals that are comparable irrespective of what items were assessed in a particular individual.
The following items were assessed in each study: exposed cohort, ascertainment of exposure, outcome of interest, comparability of cohorts, assessment of outcome, and adequacy of follow-up.
Similar(57)
First, clarity of the wording of the COHIP items was assessed in a convenience group of 15 New Caledonian children of different ethnic origins (Fig. 1).
Knowledge of all items is assessed in both verbal and non-verbal modalities of stimulus and/or response, enabling the detection of differential impairments across these domains of input/output.
Each item was assessed in terms of how well the area was addressed and reported by investigators in relation to the aims of this review.
Each item was assessed in relation to a conceptual definition on a seven-point Likert scale from 1 (not relevant/not clear) to 7 (relevant/clear).
Intake of each item was assessed in 10 categories; 'never' to '2+ times per day' for foods and 'never to '6+ times per day' for beverages, and 3 portion size categories.
These items were assessed as specified in the study protocol.
Items were assessed for inclusion in the factor analysis on the basis of sufficient correlation (r > 0.2) with at least one other item.
The validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the remaining 46 items were assessed and the results are presented in the sections below.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com