Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
To determine appropriate survey items, we reviewed the literature on food environment assessments via Google Scholar and PubMed, supplemented with a "snowballing" method to search for other relevant information.
Similar(59)
We reviewed the items described in the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research SRQRR) [8] and the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research ENTREQQ) [9] statement.
First, we reviewed the actual items to make sure the thresholds corresponded to the reading load and complexity of individual items.
We reviewed the frequencies of responses to the individual items as we reviewed comments from the other two data sources [ 26].
Of all the items the president reviewed, the one that he seemed to understand best was the most low-tech.
There is great variability in the number of items on the surveys we reviewed (84.4 ± 72.7).
A spokeswoman for the department, Vickie Karp, said, "we will review the items they plan to sell prior to the auction date to ensure they do not sell anything that belongs to the city".
Two other study investigators (CB, POS) reviewed the items and we rephrased or eliminated problematic items.
Here's a nostalgic look back at the items we've recently reviewed here at CrunchGear….
Two domain experts reviewed the 39 items.
Project personnel then reviewed the revised items and participants' responses from the second review.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com