Sentence examples for items we observed from inspiring English sources

For subsequently forgotten remote items, we observed a strikingly different pattern of results.

Indeed, while for negative items we observed a significant old/new difference in emotional change across sleep (t(45) = 3.3, P = 0.002), this effect was absent for neutral items across sleep (t(45) = 0.5, P = 0.64).

In contrast to studies using different items we observed no behavioural differences between the two kinds of decision; participants were equally able to distinguish category members from non-members, regardless of whether they were performing a recognition or categorisation judgement.

While reviewing the 'General coping' items, we observed a mixture of active coping and avoidance.

Second, when examining the individual items, we observed an overall effect of group (F 1,413)=17.68, P<0.001).

In the comparison between treated and control items, we observed a main effect of item type immediately after training (F 1, 16) = 6.25, P =.02, and η =.28), due to a better performance on treated (σ = 60.06, δ = 34.77) as compared to control items (σ = 25.78, δ = 21.52).

In the OLD 3 item, we observed that when the line that represents answer 1 ("nothing") started to decline, changes in theta were quite sensible (representing discrimination ability) until they became most probable for the specific level (i.e., to j 1 of item OLD 3 = − 1.98 theta) the alternative choice 2 (mean).

For a given line item, we observe the date for which the procedure was billed, the three-digit zip code, and the amount that the insurance company reimbursed the service provider, known as the allowed amount, and any modifier codes.11.11

In our study, the chewing function score was indeed significantly correlated with these three OHIP items, and we observed the highest correlations between chewing function scores and OHIP items for these items, except for a similarly high correlation observed for the item "trouble pronouncing any words".

Nevertheless, after computing a percentage of belonging to the categories for each sound of the 150-item corpus, we observed that these disparities in classification were only concentrated on certain sounds, which were then rejected (26 sounds under a threshold of about 65% of belonging to a category).

Except for item 23, these are the same items for which we observed the highest number of disagreements in the inter-assessment analysis.