Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(15)
A random sample of 96 items was scored by both testers, revealing a significant correlation (r = 0.91, p < 0.001).
None of the items was scored correctly by all caregivers.
The number of correctly remembered items was scored by the experimenter.
Each of these items was scored as "yes" (2), "no" (0), or "unclear" (1).
Each of the original 65 items was scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 = never to 4 = always.
The total time to complete the 12 shapes was recorded and the accuracy of items was scored with one point for every correct line segment.
Similar(45)
Multiple-choice items are scored by machines, but open-ended items are scored by subjective humans who are prone to errors.
Items are scored on a four-point ordinal rating scale.
The nausea and vomiting items were scored separately.
Survey items were scored on a 5-point scale.
If an item contained sub items, the concerning item was scored present if at least 50% of the sub items were scored present.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com