Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Intention (3 items) was adopted directly from Taylor and Todd's (1995) scale and SN (2 items) was adapted and revised to "parents" and "friends" rather than "people who influence my behavior" and "people who are important to me" in the original scale.
Based on the findings of the systematic review (which identified the same method of scoring for the final six measures included), the method of scoring items was adopted from these final six measures.
Similar(58)
Utilitarian (3 items) and uniqueness (3 items) were adopted directly from Merle et al. (2010) research.
To assess relationship commitment five items were adopted from the Commitment Inventor y (CI) [ 19].
Three items were adopted from previous research to reflect public stigma [ 14].
These items were adopted from questionnaires reported in the relevant literature [ 15, 16].
Some of items were adopted from the SF-36, which is used extensively in a wide range of medical conditions.
All of these codes and items were adopted from the ICF checklist [ 33], ICF-CY, WHODAS 2.0, and CFFS.
However, although the food security items were adopted from scales used in developing countries and have high internal consistency [Cronbach's alpha = 0.81], the fact that they are not validated locally might lead to a problem of misclassification.
This item was adopted from the TEAN study [ 22], with possible responses ranging from '0' to '4 or more'.
Secondly, a restraint item is adopted to constrain the back projection matrix.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com