Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
Data collection was undertaken via internet-based questionnaires, with the exact number of rounds dependent on the rate with which consensus on specific items was achieved.
For this study, a modest sample to item ratio of 8.5 1 (341 participants, 40 questionnaire items) was achieved (MacCallum et al., 1999).
Pooled analyses showed that short-term retention on most items was achieved.
The reduction to the final set of seven items was achieved through factor analysis where four items were removed to leave the final MIL 7-item version.
The revisions were evaluated during subsequent repetitions of the process with new participants, until a stable and well understood version of all items was achieved.
Overall fit to the model of the remaining 14 items was achieved with a non-significant (Bonferroni adjusted P = 0.05/14 = 0.004) chi-square value (44.45, df = 28, P = 0.025).
Similar(54)
Retrieval of items is achieved by 'walking' through the loci, allowing the latter to activate the desired items.
If we allow things to continue at this pace, we'll have grown old and died before all four items are achieved.
Most items were located in the 1st quadrant (hard items were not achieved) and the 3rd quadrant (easy items were achieved).
An association score was subsequently calculated, by taking the importance of an item for that particular patient (ranging from 1 to 4) multiplied by whether or not the item was achieved (recoded to -1 ((really) not achieved) and +1 ((really) achieved).
Consensus on item level was achieved when > 70%% of the panellists scored that item as relevant and the average rating ≥ 4.0 (scale 0 5).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com