Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Similar(60)
For the analysis of the European study a novel approach was adopted in which items shown to be valued differently in different countries were treated as individual items.
An even more complicated scenario arises if the items to be curated have to be valued according to more than one criterion: a multi-dimensional problem, of which the simplest case is the two-dimensional.
Such problems are likely to arise in any multinational study involving patient-reported outcome measures, as items in the scales are likely to be valued differently in different cultures.
This would, in principle, allow the values of some missing data items to be deduced from the values of related data elsewhere in the file.
Moderate to high alpha coefficients for each leg scale and the overall instrument were expected (a widely-accepted criterion is that alpha should be 0.70 or higher for a set of items to be considered a scale. Values at or above this level are considered moderate to high [ 16]).
Utility scores are generated using the time-trade off approach where the responses to the five items are valued based on general population valuation scores.
Items inside Daemonheim are valued according to tiers.
The items have been valued at £10,000.
Items were valued in Zambian Kwacha (K) and converted to United States Dollars (US$) at the average exchange rate in the study period, of about K3,600 to US$1 [ 19].
The list said the three items were valued at $2,993.
Some individual items were valued as high as $60,000.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com