Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
After the intervention, the knowledge of essential items that should be included in a disaster preparedness kit showed statistically significant changes most of the necessary items showed a significant increase, while most of the unnecessary items showed a significant decrease (Table 2).
Detection times were faster when targets were food rather than nonfood items, and the detection advantage for food items showed a significant negative correlation with Body Mass Index (BMI).
Five items showed a significant change post clerkship.
NS; not significant None of the items showed a significant association with plaque scores (Table 4).
Concerning the factor "age", 9 items showed a significant intersubject effect that reached small effect sizes between 0.10 and 0.13 for 7 of them.
Out of 28 items, only 2 items showed a significant difference in the test-retest results which affected the domain scores on hypertension and hyperlipidaemia.
Similar(53)
The item fit measure weighted mean square (WMNSQ) showed acceptable values (between 0.91 and 1.14); only one item showed a significant deviation from the model with a t value of 2.4, which was beyond the acceptable interval of [−1.96; 1.96].
Each ADL item showed a significant worsening at both three and six months for both groups.
Finally, although a substantial percentage of students (31.4%) continued to place the extinct common ancestor correctly at the base of the tree, students whose scores did change on this item showed a significant decrease in ability in the postconcept assessment.
Only three Balon items showed a statistically significant change post clerkship, all of which were in the positive direction.
STAI-S items measuring reduced "positive affect" (Mathews & Mackintosh, 2000), were moderately and significantly associated with distortion, r = −.30, P = .01, one-tailed, whereas the remaining STAI-S items showed a small and non-significant correlation, r = −.14, P = .27, with the magnitude of these correlations again differing significantly, t 56) = 2.01, P = .024, one-tailed, d = .54.54
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com