Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(14)
In order to evaluate whether scores on the eight items of the two assessment tasks were significantly different across schools, interaction analysis between item difficulty and schools was conducted.
More specifically, we hypothesized that any difference in N400 amplitude in response to unrelated items of the two categories, or in the underlying neural generators investigated by means of LORETA source reconstruction, would suggest a differentiated neural mechanism for representing words belonging to the two categories.
All items of the two groups were combined and led to 309 items.
Analyses were assessed by differences between the scores of all items of the two extreme groups.
Items with a reversed score were recoded, after which mean scores on the items of the two scales were calculated.
The extreme group analysis showed significant differences between the scores of all items of the two extreme groups (P < 0.001).
Similar(46)
Examples for short items of the three categories are "Text" (text) – "Tekst" – "Tokst".
Group differences in responses to the items of the four scales are depicted in Table 1.
Only items of the four instruments with the best published psychometric testing results where analysed.
All items of the four separate LVQOL dimensions fit the GRM.
All items of the four LVQOL dimensions fit the GRM, also after two items were removed because of DIF.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com