Exact(5)
Recalling the notations mentioned previously, the similarity between two items is defined as begin{aligned} s(i_j,i_k)=frac{sum _{i=1}^{n}r_{i,j}r_{i,k}}{sqrt{r_{1,j}^{2} +cdots +r_{n,j}^{2}}sqrt{r_{1,k}^{2}+r_{n,k}r_{n,k}^{2}}} end{aligned} (1 where (i_j) and (i_k) represent two individual items.
The sum of these ratings for all 5 items is defined as the PANSS-EC total score which ranged from 5 to 35.
The number of correctly identified items as a percentage of the total number of correct items is defined as recall (R).
The situation where subjects from different groups, with the same level of the attribute, respond with different probabilities to endorse an items is defined as differential item functioning (DIF) [ 21].
The item scalability coefficient H i is defined as (3) H i = ∑ j ≠ i C o v (X i, X j ) ∑ j ≠ i C o v max (X i, X j ), and the scalability coefficient H for k items is defined as (4) H = ∑ i = 1 k - 1 ∑ j = i + 1 k C o v (X i, X j ) ∑ i = 1 k − 1 ∑ j = i + 1 k C o v max (X i, X j ).
Similar(3)
Level 1 items were defined as those achieving group consensus (>67%) in all four questions, and therefore by inference were deemed essential for consideration when selecting or developing any exercise and sport science performance test.
Easy items were defined as having fit residuals that loaded negatively on the first component [ 29].
According to the answer, each response was scored 1 (negative attitude) to 3 (positive attitude) and a sum of these five items was defined as the attitude score.
Related(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com