Pattern similarity values were aggregated according to whether or not the items had shared context information during encoding, that is, same-room vs different-room similarity.
Similarity values were then summarized according to whether the items had shared context information during encoding (same room from the same study list: for example, 'the apple is in the bedroom' and 'the pencil is in the bedroom') or had not shared information (different rooms from the same study list: for example, 'the apple is in the bedroom' and 'the chair is in the kitchen').
Users who have not signed up for Google Plus will see any other items they have shared with Google, like photos they have uploaded to its Picasa service, and items posted publicly on Google Plus by people Google assumes they know because they communicate with them on Gmail, for instance.
Google users see social content only when they are logged in to Google and see posts only from people they have chosen to follow on Google Plus who have shared specific items with them.
Google Plus posts that appear in search results are only from people whom Google users have chosen to follow on Google Plus and who have shared specific items with them or made them public.
And while today is the site's first official unveiling, it has quietly built up a user-base of 10,000 who have shared 750,000 items, so there's plenty to read about.
Your doctor will ask about your medical profile, about other persons you may have shared personal items with, your marital state or if you have had any sexual activity with a partner or partners, what sexual safety precautions you take, etc.Then, there are two types of tests that can be performed.
More than 500,000 items have been shared in more than 40 countries.
However, more people reported having shared toiletry items in the general population sample than in the prison sample.
The next day, after the National Park Service retweeted an accurate post about the size of the Inaugural crowd, the President called the director of the service to ask why its staff had shared the item — surely the most gratuitous case of Presidential intimidation of the career bureaucracy since the Nixon Administration.
