Sentence examples for items differences from inspiring English sources

In this study, meteorology and radiation observation data of two typical urban landscape communities (a typical architectural complex and a green park) in Beijingwere used to analyze the climate differences and energy budget items differences with alocalscaleurban meteorological parameterization scheme (LUMPS).

When individuals are asked to determine the numbers of briefly presented visual items, differences in the slope accuracy are typically found between small versus large numbers [1], [2].

Accordingly, using the composite scale with all items, differences were also clearly misestimated (0.24 ≤ ESPI-ALL ≤ 0.32).

In each of these items differences were caused by a higher severity score given by the parent, e.g. for pain eight (out of 29) parents scored moderate to severe problems whereas the child scored only mild.

With regard to items, differences were significant in Items 6, 10, 7, 8, 2 and 5 (in descending order with regard to effect size) and there at least of medium size.

In order to test the main hypotheses, for total ISAHCQ scores as well as for single items, differences between pre-, post-, and follow-up measurements were analysed by a non-parametric test for paired ordinal data (Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

In addition, paired comparisons reveal statistically significant per-item differences in mean response between evolution and creationism (Student's t-test, p < 0.01 for each item).

Furthermore, individual and item differences could be explained substantially by the test-taker's educational attainment, language, and cognitive skill level, and by the item's difficulty and position.

The present study used a model-based approach to provide empirical evidence that disengaged responding in the large-scale assessment PIAAC can be explained by individual and item differences.

Across participant differences were analysed with repeated measures ANOVAs or paired t-tests; across item differences were analysed with one-way ANOVAs.

To examine face validity, we compared SRQ-20 items with ASCL items qualitatively, identifying parallel content and item differences.