Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
The recommendations related to obtaining consent are detailed below; this item in particular required specific input from the patient representative (refer to the online supplementary material for individual scores on additional questions that had means scores of between 6.2 9.4).
Each criterion applied to GAS pharyngitis was split into 1 4 items (one point per item), as detailed below.
The specific items are detailed below.
The specific modifications and the items changed are detailed below.
Numbered items in this photo are detailed below.
Survey items relevant to the current analyses are detailed below.
They also responded to items that corresponded to the Leinwand et al. framework, as detailed below.
Problematic items were excluded based on the adopted criteria (MI ≥ 30; Brown 2006) and on methodological decisions detailed below.
(2004) and detailed below.
As detailed below.
Item Details.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com