Sentence examples for items degree from inspiring English sources
Once we had verified the unidimensionality of the internet digital competences scale, we calculated a global variable from the sum of items: "Degree of digital competence" (0 54).
D. Function in sport and recreation (Sport_Rec) (five items); Degree of difficulty in: (1) squatting; (2) running; (3) jumping; (4) twisting/pivoting on injured knee; and (5) kneeling.
The three-part questionnaire contains 70 items, plus 13 additional items specifically for third and fifth-year students: A. Perceptions about FM (19 items): degree of agreement with statements about the social and scientific status of FM (8 items), importance of the factors that could have influenced these opinions (6 items), and feedback within the medical school about FM (5 items).
The Democrats can't boast a single statewide office-holder.In this section Look who's listening Hands off An easy choice for Mr Romney Out of the mouths of babes A grain of sand for your thoughts Reprints Related items Degrees of separationJul 14th 2005Yet as in Washington, the Republican machine is sputtering.
When the time decay is slow (β is small but non-zero), the items with large initial relevance have long time to attract attention, resulting in high item degree and a broad item degree distribution.
In most online networks, the growth is driven by preferential attachment which implies that the likelihood for an item to receive a new link is proportional item degree (k_{alpha}) [23].
While a small value of λ leads to a heterogeneous distribution of initial item relevance, a high value results in a narrow distribution of relevance and thus a narrow distribution of item degree.
We choose the time decaying parameter β in order to maximize the agreement between the real and model item degree distribution (see Figure 2 for the result with (beta=0.025) and (lambda=1.5)).
Because of shared proportionality to item degree, if we plot the probability for a user to collect an item as a function of the number of friends that have collected it (f_{ialpha}), we essentially see the effect of preferential attachment.
The items are scored from zero to three, according to endorsement of the item, degree of distress experienced, the frequency of occurrence or the certainty of belief.
This might be required if resources do not allow for the tailoring of information to a precise (i.e. item-by-item) degree.
