Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(8)
Of note, fewer patients completed the questions concerning sexual functioning and enjoyment compared to the other items (data not shown).
We observed minor differences when the analysis was repeated with the outcome variable based on restricted items (data not shown).
There were no significant differences between "middle age men" and other men in all items (data not shown).
On the GBS-ADL, there were no differences in the separate items (data not shown) or in total score.
As a result, the Delphi process led to semantic changes in three of the translated items (data not shown, details are readily available upon request).
The analysis of age at diagnosis groups (0 6 years, ≥ 7 years) revealed no differences in the above items (data not shown).
Similar(52)
No significant differences between the mean scores for influence on dignity on both measurements existed; neither for all items combined, nor for any individual item (data not shown).
The mean differences of all individual items were, as well as the total score, negative on each item (data not shown).
Median kappa for the first 17 items was 0.75 and for the other items, 0.84 (data not shown).
Food frequency questionnaires were sometimes administered by interview, and sometimes self-administered, and differed substantially in the number of food items included (data not shown in the table).
Inter-item correlations (data not shown) were also within acceptable ranges (less then 0.80) for all pairs of items [ 26].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com