Sentence examples for items are categorised from inspiring English sources

After learning, new items are categorised based on a Pearson measurement comparing the firing behaviour of the second subnet on trained items, and the test item.

The items are categorised according to the criteria set out in the DSM-IV: criteria B (intrusive re-experiencing), criteria C (avoidance and numbness) and criteria D (hyperarousal).

The Rasch analysis can be used to see if items are categorised correctly and threshold ordering was considered for this purpose.

The test items are categorised as diagnostic, investigative or treatment options and examinees are required to rate their agreement with the provided response options based on a combination of clinical information that is provided [ 15].

After the removal of duplicate items (n = 276), 68 items were categorised into the five pre-determined domains.

Persons scoring "often" or "always" to one or more of the five items were categorised as having inadequate HL.

According to Knaus et al [ 2] TISS 28 items were categorised as active (AT) or non-active (NAT) treatment variables.

Responses to the items were categorised by the percentage of correct answers: poor (<50%), moderate (50%70%70%) and good (>70%).

Free-text responses to open-ended items were categorised and used to extend and illustrate the quantitative findings.

The rest, those who responded "sometimes" to at least one item and not "often" or "always" to any items, were categorised as having problematic HL.

The items were categorised into the following six domains: Enhanced emotional support, Enhanced collaboration, Improved moral reflexivity, Improved moral attitude, Improvement on organizational level and Concrete results.