Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Points are based upon the number of items and trials needed for recall.
For example, the Back Group uses a scale with 11 items, and trials of acceptable quality are defined as those meeting 50% of the criteria (i.e. a minimum of six) [ 23].
Similar(58)
Two trials fulfilled 7 and 8 items respectively, five trials fulfilled one to five items and one trial offered no information on any item.
The items were presented in a pseudo-randomised sequence, with six trials per item and 18 trials per cat.
Confidence ratings for correct item recognition for both constituents did not differ between trials in which only item memory was correct and trials in which item and associative memory were correct.
One of the objects is then replaced with a new item and, in Trial 2, the animal has the choice of interacting with the novel or the familiar object.
Jiggle events were evenly distributed between target and distractor items and occurred every 7 9 trials (once every 40 s on average).
Linear regression was also applied with the outcome variable being the total number of fulfilled items per trial and predictor variables being journal impact factor and year of publication.
Wi-Fi pie in the sky Consumer republic Budget room A hit on their hands A new mouseketeer Some like it hot Reprints Related items Trials and errorsJan 14th 2005If Mr Ebbers's appeal fails, he could theoretically get up to 85 years in jail.
PMAs encourage uniformity in common protocol items amongst trials, including data collection and outcome definitions, whilst permitting flexibility in pre-specified protocol details and funding regulations.
To increase difficulty of the search task, (1) we used large set sizes (50 or 80 items per trial), and (2) the intersection of the L distractors was offset by 2 pixels (search items were 20 × 20 pixels, 0.72-degree visual angle) to increase target-distractor similarity (see Fig. 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com