Suggestions(2)
Exact(4)
The CBCL for ages 4 to 18 years (CBCL/4-18) incompetencepetence items and problems items.
The 10-item Alcohol Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) [ 28] assesses alcohol consumption level (3 items), symptoms of alcohol dependence (3 items), and problems associated with alcohol use (4 items).
The 10-item Alcohol Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) [ 17] assesses alcohol consumption level (3 items), symptoms of alcohol dependence (3 items), and problems associated with alcohol use (4 items).
For patients with hand OA disease specific health problems are self-reported by the AUSCAN, which comprises 15 items relating to hand stiffness (one item), pain (five items) and problems with performance of activities (nine items).
Similar(56)
For both encoding items and problem-solving items, participants' responses were coded for whether they correctly represented both slope and intercept.
Three AUDIT subscale scores were calculated to measure alcohol consumption (AUDIT items 1-3), dependence (items 4-6) and problems (or adverse consequences) (items 7-10) [ 72, 75].
The results regarding sleep difficulty (item 11) and problems concentrating (item 22) may reveal the same physical/social interaction.
We included the following variables for the adjusted analyses; age, gender, in relationship, overactive, aggressive, disruptive or agitated behaviour (honos item 1), non-accidental self-injury (honos item 2) and problems with activities of daily living (honos item 10).
SPSQ consists of 34 items tapping the dimensions incompetence (11 items), spouse relationship problems (5 items), role restriction (7 items), social isolation (7 items), and health problems (4 items).
We found that overactive, aggressive, disruptive or agitated behaviour (honos item 1) and problems with activities of daily living (honos item 10) had the greatest impact in the adjusted analyses.
The survey of these items and the problems they generate will then allow us to see in greater detail the main motivation for Ockham's innovations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com