Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(11)
The purpose of this study was to assess the association between IL-6 and CRP with depressive items and cognitive function.
The FIM [ 36] consists of 18 items from motor (13 items) and cognitive (5 items) domains.
It consists of three subscales, including 'General Fatigue' (six items), 'Sleep/Rest Fatigue' (six items), and 'Cognitive Fatigue' (six items).
The five functional scales include physical function (five items), role function (two items), emotional function (four items), social function (two items) and cognitive function (two items).
There were no consistently significant associations between changes in other ESS items and cognitive performance at week 6 for lurasidone or quetiapine XR (all subjects or U.S. sites).
Several factors may have biased the interpretation of FD effects in these studies: times and number of assessments; types of subjective items and cognitive tasks; number of subjects; sex effects; exact amount of fluid intake during euhydrated control trials.
Similar(49)
The severity scales of DRS-R-98 include two subscales: non-cognitive (items 1 8) and cognitive (items 9 13) [ 50].
There are three FIM scores: a total score (FIM total: 18 items), a physical score (FIM physical: 13 items), and a cognitive score (FIM cognitive: five items).
Briefly, the development involved three distinct steps – focus groups, item development, and cognitive interviews – before items for the questionnaire were drafted.
The EDI questionnaire evaluates five domains of child development: Physical health and wellbeing (items A2-A13 and C58/17 28 and 126); Social competence (items C1-C25 and C27, 69 93 and 95); Emotional maturity (items C28-C57/96 125); Language and cognitive development (items B8-B33/36 61); and Communication and general knowledge (items B1-B7 and C26/29-35 and 94).
The FIM is an 18-item ordinal measure of disability which includes 13 motor items and five cognitive items [ 3].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com