Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(7)
Of those items, a total of 456 were ivory, 84 were suspected ivory and 75 were related wildlife products.
Further investigation showed that of these CBA DIF items, a total of 8 items were classified as domain-specific (73%).
After excluding skewed items, a total of 29 items were entered in an initial principal components analysis.
Among the 45 items, a total of 18 items (shown in Table 3) met the model's expectations fairly well (infit and outfit MNSQ within 0.5 and 1.5).
For the administered group, the possible range of missed items was 0-1827 (i.e. 87 items per PU-QOL × 21 administrations = 1827 total items); a total of three PU-QOLs were returned with 29 items missed (1.6%).
The response on the EC-17 was 91.8%, but because we treated the not applicable response option as missing and no total score was computed with more than 3 missing items, a total of 36 scores remained (73.5%).
Similar(53)
Full item banks (e.g., the long forms) were administered for depressive symptoms (15 items), anxiety (20 items), peer relationships (15 items), and anger (11 items) for a total of 61 items.
Using the Latent Gold software (Vermunt & Magidson, 2005, 2008), we estimated the category intercepts for each item (a total of 41 science attitudes items) by fitting separate models to the individual attitudinal subscales.
Figure 3 SEM model with reciprocal paths - model B. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests of all items in the three behaviour constructs and parental involvement construct for children's gender provide significant results for only four items of a total of 24 items.
This comprised 8 additional items, with a total of 43 items.
Each domain was further divided into two to five questions (items) for a total of 13 items.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com