Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
These averages were obtained by dividing the itemized total costs in Tables 2 by 974000, 536000 and 5510000 diabetes cases in group 1, 2 and 3 respectively.
Note: These averages were obtained by dividing the itemized total costs in Tables 2 by 974000, 536000 and 5510000 diabetes cases in group 1, 2 and 3 respectively.
The averages in the three tables were obtained by dividing the itemized total costs in Tables 2, 3 and 4 by the respective year's number of mild/moderate cases, severe cases, and cholera-related deaths.
These averages were obtained by dividing the itemized total costs in Tables 2, 3 and 4 by 125018, 203564 and 110,837 cholera cases in year 2005, 2006 and 2007 respectively.
The averages in this table were obtained by dividing the itemized total costs in Table 2 by the respective group's number of cases in need of insulin, syringes, reagent strips, glucose meters, oral drugs, hospital outpatient department consultations, hospitalization and diabetes related tests; and numbers of permanently disabled, temporary disabled, premature deaths and care givers.
Note: The averages in this table were obtained by dividing the itemized total costs in Table 2 by the respective group's number of cases in need of insulin, syringes, reagent strips, glucose meters, oral drugs, hospital outpatient department consultations, hospitalization and diabetes related tests; and numbers of permanently disabled, temporary disabled, premature deaths and care givers.
Similar(54)
Their itemized deductions total $15,073 (Line 28).
Over all, their itemized deductions total $20,580 (Line 28).
Their itemized deductions total $20,900 (Line 28) and they are not reduced as they are for more affluent filers.
Households whose itemized deductions total less than the new standard deduction would simply take the standard deduction regardless of their level of charitable giving.
That will raise your 2013 itemized deduction total on your federal return but lower your 2014 deduction.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com