Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Average scores per item were generated by summing positive answers for academic or personal favours and dividing them by the number of items in the scale, so that the overall scores had the possible range from 0 to 1 indicating the average per-item fraction of positive answers.
Similar(59)
Item generation: Potential questionnaire items were generated by reviewing literature regarding sensations in chronic pain and neuropathy and from previous patient reports of laryngeal discomfort [ 8].
The OHS items were generated by conducting qualitative interviews with patients before and after undergoing hip replacement surgery, which suggested that pain and functional disability were generally inextricably linked.
In their system, cloze test items were generated by removing one or more words from a passage and the learners were asked to fill the missing words.
The items were generated by literature search, clinicians and patients.
Items were generated by reviewing existing guidelines and by interviewing medical specialists and patients.
Items were generated by the expert panel and the qualitative, open-ended interviews with patients.
Items were generated by the first author in collaboration with patients and healthy people [ 4].
Initially these items were generated by reviewing previous literature on over 60 assessment instruments [ 25].
The items were generated by reviewing past literature related to premenstrual experience, in particular recent qualitative research on premenstrual coping.
Items were generated by the research team, including the authors and focus group members, and by a review of relevant literature.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com