Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Assessment and diagnosis for each item were conducted by eight psychiatric emergency physicians or doctors on duty at the University Hospital, under the supervision of a senior psychiatrist (the designated psychiatrist).
Similar(59)
Visual inspection of the residuals on all categories and for each item was conducted for the negative and positive affect.
The review process for each item was conducted to find out whether it corresponded to: a) absent, incorrect or incomplete recommendation; or b) correct and complete recommendation.
To assess DIF in RUMM, analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the standardized response residuals for each item was conducted across each level of the factors and class interval (i.e., at different levels of trait).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the standardized response residuals for each item was conducted across each level of the factors and the class interval (i.e., at different levels of the trait) [ 27, 28].
Descriptive analyses of questionnaire items were conducted using SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Carry, NC, 2002 2010).
Procedures concerning imputation of missing items were conducted according to the respective guidelines.
Due to the sample size, simple descriptive frequencies for these items were conducted.
Spearman's correlation and regression analyses (linear regression model) as well as equipercentile linking of Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S), Agitation and Calmness Evaluation Scale (ACES) and PANSS-EC items were conducted to examine the scale's diagnostic validity.
Correlation (Spearman's) and regression analyses (linear mixed models) as well as equipercentile linking of the CGI-S, ACES and the PANSS-EC items were conducted to examine the scale's diagnostic validity.
A multivariate multiple regression analysis predicting each of the PTGI items was conducted with young adults who experienced the Great East Japan Earthquake (N = 316).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com