Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Each item of the sequence was displayed for 1500 ms and was followed by an inter-stimulus-interval of 400 ms. Sequences were predefined and pseudo-randomised.
Similar(59)
To remove this possible impediment to off-line skill improvements, participants who recalled more than 4 items of the sequence were excluded from analysis (n = 2).
Both groups remembered more items of the sequence in postblock reproduction of the last 10 items during the course of the experiment (ANOVA, effect of block, F 3.58, 64.48)=31, p<0.001).
In fact, this problem is difficult because each item of this sequence relies on the previous relation.
starting from σ 0 = 0. Lemma 2.3 The first item of the iterative sequence { x k } of (2.9) and that of (2.6) are equal if b k = b + 1 λ σ (2.10).
The length of a sequence is the number of items in the sequence.
The output is the number of applications occurrence from 9 am to 11 am as shown in the Fig. 9. "K" represents the sequence length, i.e., the number of items in the sequence.
Next, we analyzed the distribution of errors around the target orientation (orientation of the item that was probed; see Fig. 1c) and the nontarget orientations (those of items in the sequence that were not probed; Fig. 1d).
The experimental design demonstrated that the lemurs were using internal representation of the sequence to guide their responses and not simply following a trained sequence, where one item in the sequence cues the selection of the next.
Participants were always probed on the cued item at the end of the sequence.
As outlined above it was suggested recently that the apparent left-sided neglect in number bisection tasks may not necessarily reflect an isomorphism of physical and number space (as proposed by [ 11]; see [ 12] for a review) but may be driven by poor memorization of the initial items of the number sequences presented due to impaired working memory ([ 22, 23]; for a review see [ 13]).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com