The REMARK 20-item guideline was used to assess the quality of the reporting in the prognostic studies identified, only for RCTs.
Analyzed by checklist item, STROBE (34 items) and PRISMA (27 items) were the only reporting guidelines with all items evaluated; the QUOROM (1/17 items), STARD (1/25 items), and STRICTA (17/20 items) guidelines were evaluated for a subset of items.
Managers outlined ideas such as how to optimize the procedure and structure of team meetings by supplying agenda items, guidelines for the meetings, specific roles, and rotating moderators.
It is recommended to consult the manual during assessment, since it provides detailed item scoring guidelines in addition to more general guidelines regarding administration.
Item writing guidelines for multiple choice questions (MCQs) advise authors to create as many options as feasible [ 1- 3].
Additional items for guideline implementation barriers were initially derived by two members (PW, CZ) of the research group and checked by a third researcher (EH).
In accordance with item writing guidelines (Haladyna, 2004), commonly observed or typical errors (in this case those made by trainee CBT-E therapists) were used to generate plausible but incorrect distractor items.
This could be very helpful in designing PRQs at a taxonomically higher order and, therefore, we suggest that pattern recognition should be added as a specific medical concept to MCQ item writing guidelines [ 24].
