Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
it would take time
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"it would take time" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to an activity that requires effort or would take more than just a few moments to complete. For example, "I wanted to finish the project quickly, but I realized it would take time."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Sports
General Communication
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
It would take time, perhaps two seasons.
News & Media
I knew it would take time.
News & Media
They acknowledged that it would take time and patience.
News & Media
Abbess Yin could open them, but it would take time.
News & Media
Ms. White concurred, but she cautioned it would take time.
News & Media
They cautioned that it would take time to understand it.
News & Media
Norfleet said it would take time to compete regularly.
News & Media
It would take time, but baseball would recover.
News & Media
I knew it would take time to get it back.
News & Media
"At the start of this campaign (we) said it would take time," Mr Blinken said.
News & Media
We knew it would take time, we had to be patient, and now it's here".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "it would take time", follow it up with a reason or explanation to provide more context. For example, "It would take time to fully understand the implications of the new policy."
Common error
Avoid using "it would take time" as an excuse for lack of progress or a way to deflect accountability. Ensure that realistic timelines and measurable milestones are established.
Source & Trust
94%
Authority and reliability
4.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "it would take time" functions as an explanatory statement indicating that a process or action necessitates a certain duration before completion or achievement. It often serves to manage expectations or provide context for future developments, as validated by Ludwig.
Frequent in
News & Media
43%
Sports
22%
Formal & Business
15%
Less common in
Science
9%
Encyclopedias
5%
Wiki
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "it would take time" is a versatile phrase used to convey that achieving a goal or completing a process requires a certain duration. According to Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used across various contexts. It functions as an explanatory statement to manage expectations and explain potential delays. While adaptable to both formal and informal communication, it is most frequently found in news and media sources. When using this phrase, be mindful of potential misuse such as overpromising results, and always provide sufficient context. Consider related phrases like "it will require time" or "time will be needed" for a more formal tone, or "it's going to be a while" for a casual setting. With its clear meaning and consistent usage, "it would take time" is a reliable expression for setting realistic expectations.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
it will require time
Replaces 'would' with 'will require', indicating a future necessity rather than a conditional one, adding a sense of stronger certainty.
it will be a lengthy process
Emphasizes the duration of the process using 'lengthy', suggesting more time is involved than the original phrase.
it will necessitate a period of time
More formal substitution using 'necessitate' and 'period of time', suitable for professional contexts.
time will be needed
Passive voice construction, focusing on the time itself as a requirement.
it calls for patience
Highlights the need for patience during the process rather than directly stating the time required.
it's not an overnight solution
Emphasizes the lack of immediate results, focusing on the gradual nature of the solution.
it's going to be a while
Informal and conversational way of indicating a longer duration, suitable for casual settings.
the task is not a quick fix
Highlights the complexity of the task and suggests that it requires more than just a simple solution.
achieving that won't happen instantly
Directly states that the desired outcome will not be immediate, emphasizing the delay involved.
progress will be gradual
Focuses on the nature of the progress as being slow and incremental rather than fast and sudden.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "it would take time" to sound more formal?
In formal settings, consider using phrases such as "it will require time", "it will necessitate a period of time", or "time will be needed" to convey a similar meaning with enhanced formality.
What's a more casual way to say "it would take time"?
For informal conversations, alternatives like "it's going to be a while" or "it's not an overnight solution" can be suitable.
How does using "it would take time" differ from "it will take time"?
"It would take time" often implies a conditional or hypothetical situation, while "it will take time" expresses a more definite prediction about the future. The choice depends on the level of certainty you want to convey.
Is "it would take time" interchangeable with "it requires patience"?
While related, "it would take time" emphasizes the duration required, whereas "it calls for patience" focuses on the need for endurance and tolerance during the process. The best choice depends on what aspect you want to highlight.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
94%
Authority and reliability
4.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested