Sentence examples for it would suppress from inspiring English sources

Multiple studies showed that by making an unusually high amount of Hsp70 in cells prone to protein misfolding, it would suppress the toxic effects of these misfolded proteins.

It was all done in the name of innovation, and any regulatory initiative was fought away with claims that it would suppress that innovation.

It would suppress the malaria-susceptible mosquitoes without creating mutation pressure on all mosquitoes to evolve a fungus-resistant form, as DDT created pressure to evolve pesticide-resistant forms.

Representatives of tech organizations reacted fiercely against the tax, saying that it would suppress growth in the industry that has made the city – parts of it, at least – wealthy beyond the dreams of avarice.

The State of New York argues that application of the exclusionary rule to DMV records is unreasonable because it would suppress evidence that was already in possession of the government before any stop was conducted, and would impose large burdens on the state with little benefit to potential defendants.

A recent study of elderly patients found that small doses of a rapamycin-like drug improved their immune response to a flu vaccine by 20percentt, sating worries that it would suppress immune response.

I wanted to be strong for my friends, so at times I would suppress my own emotions to help others.

One possibility is that a recession in this country, should it occur, would suppress demand enough that commodity prices would fall substantially for the first time in several years.

In the case of this kind of vicious violence we are not likely to hear that it is only the 'Nanny State' that would suppress it, that people must be allowed the freedom to choose how they live, and go to hell their own way.

Because speech is an essential mechanism of democracy it is the means to hold officials accountable to the people political speech must prevail against laws that would suppress it by design or inadvertence.

Kagan lost: the Court ruled for Citizens United, finding that the "prohibition on corporate independent expenditures is an outright ban on speech," and that "political speech must prevail against laws that would suppress it".