it would expense

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it would expense" is not correct in English.
It seems to be an incorrect construction, as "expense" is typically used as a noun rather than a verb. Example: "If we proceed with this project, it would incur significant expenses."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

In May, the company said it would expense the cost of that plan, reducing A.I.G.'s net income by $469 million over five years.

The New York Times

Wal-Mart Stores said that it would expense stock options and that a new $5 billion share-buyback program would replace an existing one.

Forbes

Ever since Coca-Cola announced that it would expense option grants a few weeks ago, a handful of companies, including Bank One and Amazon.com, have announced similar measures.

Forbes

Standard & Poor's Equity Research cut earnings estimates for McDonald's after the restaurant chain said it would expense stock options throughout 2004.

Forbes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

Amazon.com announced that it would voluntarily expense options, and Microsoft decided to do away with stock options and grant employees actual shares in the company.

The New York Times

But for small or moderate Internet companies "it would be a huge expense and a big deal," he said.

The New York Times

Aether said it would cut expenses, consolidate sites and streamline its European venture, Sila Communications, in an effort to cut operating costs and become profitable.

The New York Times

The Red Cross said it would cover expenses for months, if necessary.

The New York Times

A.I.G. also said that it would begin expensing Starr International's compensation as required by standard accounting practices, something it had not done previously.

The New York Times

Verizon Communications said yesterday that it would have expenses of as much as $3.7 billion through March for pension costs and early retirements of 21,260 employees.

The New York Times

The company also said it would begin expensing employee stock options in the fourth quarter of 2003 with a noncash charge of 20 cents a share.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "expense" as a verb. Instead, use verbs like "cost", "require", or "incur" to describe the financial impact. For example, say "it would cost" instead of "it would expense".

Common error

Many writers incorrectly use "expense" as a verb. Remember that "expense" is primarily a noun referring to a cost or expenditure. To avoid this error, rephrase your sentence using a proper verb like "cost", "require", or "incur".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it would expense" attempts to express a future action involving the recording or incurring of an expense. However, it's grammatically unconventional because "expense" is typically used as a noun, not a verb in this context. Ludwig AI highlights its uncommon usage.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

25%

Science

25%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it would expense" is grammatically questionable, as "expense" is typically a noun rather than a verb in common usage. While some examples exist, as confirmed by Ludwig, they often appear in business or financial contexts where accounting practices are discussed. However, even in these scenarios, alternative phrasings like "it would cost" or "it would incur" are more grammatically sound and widely accepted. Ludwig AI flags this construction as potentially incorrect, suggesting a need for careful consideration when using this phrase. For clarity and correctness, it is advisable to opt for more standard verb choices when discussing financial implications.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it would cost

Replaces "expense" (noun) with "cost" (noun), focusing on the financial implications.

it would require payment

Emphasizes the necessity of making a payment for something.

it would incur charges

Highlights that fees or charges would be a result of an action.

it would necessitate expenditure

More formal, indicating that spending is an unavoidable consequence.

it would involve an outlay

Focuses on the act of spending money, particularly a significant amount.

it would represent a financial burden

Emphasizes the negative impact of the cost, portraying it as a heavy load.

it would lead to a disbursement

More technical and financial, referring to the actual act of paying out money.

it would come at a price

Implies that there will be a cost associated with an action, not always monetary.

it would create an obligation

Highlights that the expense creates a debt or responsibility to pay.

it would impose a fee

Focuses specifically on the imposition of a mandatory fee.

FAQs

Is "it would expense" grammatically correct?

No, "it would expense" is not grammatically correct. "Expense" is typically used as a noun, not a verb. Instead, consider using phrases like "it would cost" or "it would require payment".

What can I say instead of "it would expense"?

You can use alternatives like "it would cost", "it would incur", or "it would require payment" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "it would expense" or "it would incur"?

"It would incur" is correct. "It would expense" is not standard English usage as "expense" functions primarily as a noun.

How can I use the word "expense" correctly in a sentence?

Use "expense" as a noun. For example, "The project would involve significant "expenses"". You can also say "The company will expense the cost of the plan" where "expense" functions as a verb, but has a different meaning related to accounting practices.