Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "it were accessible" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct form would be "it were accessible" is an archaic subjunctive form, which is rarely used in modern English.
Example: "If it were accessible, we could explore the area more thoroughly."
Alternatives: "it was accessible" or "it is accessible.".
Exact(3)
"I know some of the reasons for it, but it wouldn't be so immediate and uncontrollable if it were accessible to reason.
Bentham held, with Hobbes, that unless the language of the law and the methods used to interpret it were accessible and useful to the ordinary citizens to whom it applied, law would remain ineffectual as a guide to their behaviour.
Fewer than 20% of most male or female cancer survivors seek professional care (psychological or medical) for their sexual problems [88 90], although close to half would like such help if it were accessible and affordable [88,89].
Similar(57)
It is accessible via an entrance on its west wall.
It was accessible, imaginable".
"It's accessible.
But it is accessible.
It was accessible work.
It's accessible to all ages".
It is accessible by highway and railroad.
It's accessible and excellent.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com