it was works

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was works" is not correct in written English.
It is not usable as it does not conform to standard grammatical structures in English. Example: "It was works of art that inspired me."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

His commentaries on paintings forever changed how we view and interpret them, whether it was works at the Museum or in our own homes.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

And it was working.

The New York Times

It was working!

The New York Times

But it was working".

The New Yorker

It was working well".

The New York Times

It was worked out.

The New Yorker

"I guess it was work.

Independent

It was fun but it was work.

The New York Times

It was working, the agency was growing.

The New York Times

It was work.

The New York Times

It was working perfectly".

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming to express that something was effective or successful, opt for grammatically correct alternatives such as "it was effective" or "it was successful".

Common error

Be cautious about using plural nouns where singular forms are required. Instead of saying "it was works", use "it was work" (though this may still not be the best phrasing) or better alternatives such as "it was effective".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was works" is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI identifies it as non-standard English. Correct alternatives include using adjectives such as "effective" or "successful" to describe a positive outcome.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Wiki

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it was works" is grammatically incorrect and not recommended for use in standard English. Ludwig AI flags it as non-standard. Though some examples exist across sources such as The New York Times, Independent, and BBC, it's best to opt for grammatically correct alternatives like "it was effective" or "it was successful" to ensure clear and accurate communication. Avoiding this phrase enhances the credibility and clarity of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was effective

Replaces "works" with the adjective "effective" to indicate success or a positive outcome.

it was successful

Substitutes "works" with the adjective "successful", highlighting a favorable result.

it was functional

Uses the adjective "functional" instead of "works" to denote the ability to perform a task or function properly.

it was operative

Replaces "works" with the adjective "operative" to show something is in effect or working.

it was in operation

Changes the phrase to "it was in operation" indicating it was running or functioning.

it was underway

Uses "underway" to suggest the process was in progress or happening.

it was implemented

Indicates that something was put into effect or carried out.

it was executed

Shows that a plan or action was carried out.

it was accomplished

Indicates completion or achievement of a task.

it was achieved

Highlights the attainment of a goal or objective.

FAQs

What phrases can I use instead of "it was works"?

Instead of "it was works", you can use alternatives like "it was effective", "it was successful", or "it was functional" depending on the context.

Is "it was works" grammatically correct?

No, "it was works" is not grammatically correct in standard English. The correct phrasing would be "it was work" or, more appropriately, "it was effective" or "it was successful".

How can I use "effective" correctly in a sentence?

You can use "effective" in sentences like "The new strategy it was effective in boosting sales" or "The medicine proved to be "highly effective" in treating the infection".

What is the difference between "it was work" and "it was works"?

"It was work" implies that a task or job was being done, whereas "it was works" is grammatically incorrect. For better clarity, consider using phrases like "it was effective" or "it required effort".