it was supported by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'it was supported by' is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something was backed or endorsed by another person or organization. For example: "The project was supported by numerous leading environmental organizations."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

It was supported by seemingly ingenious structures.

The Economist

It was supported by the NRA.

The Washington Post

It was supported by the National Science Foundation.

Harvard University

It was supported by the Harvard Global Institute.

Harvard University

It was supported by the European funded LOD2 project.

The Guardian

It was supported by Republicans, Democrats, businesses and environmentalists.

The New York Times

And it was supported by massive infrastructure in Afghanistan.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

4 human-written examples

It was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation and the German Research Foundation.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

It was supported by the National Science Foundation and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

It was supported by House Republican leaders.

The New York Times

It was supported by the National Science Foundation Materials Research Science and Engineering Center Grant (MRSEC).

Harvard University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it was supported by", ensure that the subject clearly identifies what received the support and the object specifies the source of support. This makes the sentence clear and concise.

Common error

Avoid ambiguity by clearly stating who or what provided the support. Vague references can confuse readers, so be specific about the supporting entity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was supported by" functions as a passive voice construction indicating that a subject received backing, funding, or assistance from a specified source. Ludwig provides numerous examples across diverse contexts, demonstrating its versatility.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

28%

News & Media

36%

Science

22%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Wiki

6%

Encyclopedias

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it was supported by" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to indicate that something received backing, funding, or approval from a particular entity. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct for written English and widely applicable. Its usage spans across various contexts, including academia, news, science, and formal business, making it a versatile tool for conveying information about support. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying both the recipient and the source of the support to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it received backing from

Focuses on the act of receiving support or endorsement from a source.

it was endorsed by

Emphasizes formal approval or recommendation.

it was funded by

Highlights the financial aspect of the support.

it was underwritten by

Suggests a guarantee or financial backing, often in a business context.

it was championed by

Implies active advocacy and promotion by a supporter.

it was sustained by

Focuses on the continuous support that enabled its maintenance or continuation.

it was bolstered by

Highlights the strengthening or reinforcement provided by the support.

it was predicated on

Emphasizes the foundation or basis of the thing that receives support.

it relied on the support of

Stresses the dependence on the backing provided.

it drew support from

Indicates the act of obtaining support from a particular source.

FAQs

How can I use "it was supported by" in a sentence?

Use "it was supported by" to indicate that something received backing, funding, or approval from a particular source. For example, "The research was supported by the National Science Foundation."

What are some alternatives to "it was supported by"?

Alternatives include "it received backing from", "it was endorsed by", or "it was funded by", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "it was supported by"?

While "it was supported by" is in the passive voice, it's often suitable when the source of support is more important or relevant than the recipient. An active voice construction might be used if the focus is on the entity providing support, such as "The National Science Foundation supported the research."

What's the difference between "it was supported by" and "it was based on"?

"It was supported by" indicates backing or assistance, while "it was based on" implies a foundation or origin. For example, a project might be supported by grants but based on previous research findings.