it was staffed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was staffed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that a particular place or organization had personnel assigned to it at a specific time. Example: "The new restaurant opened last month, and it was staffed by a team of experienced chefs and waitstaff."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

28 human-written examples

Back in the 1970s the school turned its station, KUSC, over to public radio, where it was staffed with professionals and became the region's biggest classical music station.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

A few days previously it had cautioned its readers not to give money to Invisible Children, because of its "dubious finances" and "exaggerated claims", adding that it was "staffed by douchebags".

The Guardian

By the end it was staffed by locums and serving about 4,700 patients.

The Guardian

It was staffed by about 300 mostly elderly volunteers, and there were cash drawers instead of registers.

The New York Times

This was not an Oxford House; rather it was staffed by the homeowner, Bobby Hargrove, a man in recovery himself.

The New York Times

It was staffed by Alexander Sinyavsky, an amateur kickboxer and the director of a children's sports organization.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

32 human-written examples

It is staffed entirely by volunteers.

The New Yorker

Like the foundation, it is staffed by Haitians.

The New York Times

Today, it is staffed by people from public policy schools.

The New York Times

It is staffed by the Missionaries of Charity, founded by Mother Teresa.

The New York Times

It is staffed by highly-qualified experts and dreamers.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To enhance clarity, follow "it was staffed" with details about the type or number of personnel, for example, "It was staffed by experienced nurses".

Common error

Avoid using "it was staffed" when you mean to describe the act of staffing, instead of the state of being staffed. For example, use "they staffed it" instead of "it was staffed by them" when focusing on the action of assigning personnel.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was staffed" functions as a passive construction indicating that a particular entity (place, organization, etc.) had personnel assigned to it. This construction is used to describe the state of being manned or operated by staff. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

32%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it was staffed" is a grammatically sound and commonly used construction to indicate that a place or organization had assigned personnel at a specific time. As Ludwig AI points out, it's suitable for describing the operational status or capabilities of an entity. Predominantly found in news and scientific sources, it maintains a neutral register, making it versatile across various writing contexts. Related phrases such as "it had personnel" or "it employed people" offer alternative ways to convey similar information. It's important to use "it was staffed" when referring to a past state of being staffed, and to avoid confusion with the active act of staffing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it had personnel

Focuses on the presence of people without specifying the process of staffing.

personnel were assigned to it

Emphasizes the act of assigning individuals to a location or task.

it employed people

Emphasizes the act of hiring and employing individuals.

staff was in place

Highlights that staffing arrangements were completed and operational.

it was manned

Highlights the presence of a crew or team, typically for operation or maintenance.

it was furnished with staff

Highlights the provision of staff to the location.

it had a crew

Similar to 'it was manned' but less formal.

staff members were present

Simply indicates the presence of staff.

it had employees

Focuses on the presence of individuals working for the organization.

it featured a team

Emphasizes the presence of a group working together.

FAQs

How can I use "it was staffed" in a sentence?

Use "it was staffed" to indicate that a place or organization had personnel assigned to it at a particular time. For example, "The clinic was staffed by volunteer doctors and nurses".

What can I say instead of "it was staffed"?

You can use alternatives like "it had personnel", "it employed people", or "personnel were assigned to it" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "it was staffed by" or "it was staffed with"?

"It was staffed by" is generally preferred when indicating who performed the staffing. "It was staffed with" can be used, but is less common and might imply resources rather than people.

What's the difference between "it was staffed" and "it is staffed"?

"It was staffed" refers to a past state, indicating that personnel were present at some point in the past. "It is staffed" refers to the present, indicating that personnel are currently present.