Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

it was shocking

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"it was shocking" is correct and can be used in written English.
You may use it to describe an event or circumstance that is particularly surprising or disturbing. For example: "We were all stunned when we learned of the accident. It was shocking."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

28 human-written examples

"It was shocking.

Of course, it was shocking.

Oh, it was shocking.

News & Media

The Guardian

— but it was shocking all the same.

News & Media

The New Yorker

With that first series of camps it was shocking.

So that aspect of it was shocking.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

32 human-written examples

It is shocking.

News & Media

The New York Times

It's shocking.

News & Media

The Guardian

And it is shocking.

But it is shocking.

News & Media

The Guardian

He said: "It is shocking.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "it was shocking" to convey a sense of surprise combined with dismay or disbelief. Ensure the context clarifies the cause and subject of the shock.

Common error

Avoid using "it was shocking" as a standalone statement without providing specific details about what caused the shock. Always provide context to explain the source and nature of the surprise, ensuring clarity for the reader.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was shocking" functions as a descriptive expression, indicating a strong sense of surprise and often dismay or disbelief. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Academia

20%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Science

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "it was shocking" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase to express surprise coupled with dismay or disbelief. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. While commonly found in news and media, its usage spans various contexts, though more formal settings might benefit from nuanced alternatives. The phrase effectively conveys the speaker's emotional response to an unexpected and often disturbing event. Remember to always provide context when using "it was shocking" to ensure clarity and impact.

FAQs

How can I use "it was shocking" in a sentence?

Use "it was shocking" to describe an event or piece of information that caused surprise and often dismay. For example, "The extent of the damage /s/it+was+shocking". Ensure that the sentence provides context to understand the reason for the shock.

What are some alternatives to "it was shocking"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "/s/it+was+astonishing" , "/s/it+was+appalling", or "/s/it+was+unbelievable".

Is "it was shocking" appropriate for formal writing?

While "it was shocking" is acceptable, more formal alternatives like "/s/it+was+deeply+disturbing" or "it was profoundly unsettling" might be more suitable for academic or professional contexts.

What's the difference between "it was shocking" and "it was surprising"?

"It was surprising" indicates a general sense of unexpectedness. "It was shocking" implies a stronger emotional reaction, often involving disbelief, dismay, or moral offense. The former is neutral, while the latter is more negative.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: