Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
it was shocking
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"it was shocking" is correct and can be used in written English.
You may use it to describe an event or circumstance that is particularly surprising or disturbing. For example: "We were all stunned when we learned of the accident. It was shocking."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Alternative expressions(20)
it was astonishing
it was appalling
it was unbelievable
it was outrageous
it was staggering
it was horrifying
it was deeply disturbing
it was completely unexpected
it was a complete surprise
it was alarming
it was perplexing
it was devastating
it was disconcerting
it was tragic
it was horrific
it was harrowing
it was catastrophic
it was terrifying
it was frightening
it was intimidating
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
28 human-written examples
"It was shocking.
Academia
Of course, it was shocking.
News & Media
Oh, it was shocking.
News & Media
— but it was shocking all the same.
News & Media
With that first series of camps it was shocking.
Academia
So that aspect of it was shocking.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
32 human-written examples
It is shocking.
News & Media
It's shocking.
News & Media
And it is shocking.
News & Media
But it is shocking.
News & Media
He said: "It is shocking.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "it was shocking" to convey a sense of surprise combined with dismay or disbelief. Ensure the context clarifies the cause and subject of the shock.
Common error
Avoid using "it was shocking" as a standalone statement without providing specific details about what caused the shock. Always provide context to explain the source and nature of the surprise, ensuring clarity for the reader.
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "it was shocking" functions as a descriptive expression, indicating a strong sense of surprise and often dismay or disbelief. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage.
Frequent in
News & Media
65%
Academia
20%
Formal & Business
5%
Less common in
Science
5%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "it was shocking" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase to express surprise coupled with dismay or disbelief. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. While commonly found in news and media, its usage spans various contexts, though more formal settings might benefit from nuanced alternatives. The phrase effectively conveys the speaker's emotional response to an unexpected and often disturbing event. Remember to always provide context when using "it was shocking" to ensure clarity and impact.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
it was astonishing
Replaces "shocking" with "astonishing", suggesting a sense of great surprise and wonder, but potentially less negative connotation.
it was appalling
Substitutes "shocking" with "appalling", indicating a stronger sense of disgust and disapproval.
it was unbelievable
Replaces "shocking" with "unbelievable", focusing on the incredulity of the situation.
it was outrageous
Substitutes "shocking" with "outrageous", highlighting the sense of moral offense.
it was staggering
Replaces "shocking" with "staggering", emphasizing the overwhelming nature of the surprise.
it was horrifying
Substitutes "shocking" with "horrifying", increasing the intensity to suggest something deeply disturbing.
it was deeply disturbing
More formal alternative to "shocking", indicating a profound sense of unease.
it was completely unexpected
Focuses on the surprise element, replacing "shocking" with a description of the lack of anticipation.
it was simply stunning
Suggests the event was both shocking and impressive, leaning towards amazement.
it was a complete surprise
Highlights the unexpected nature of the event, minimizing the negative connotations.
FAQs
How can I use "it was shocking" in a sentence?
Use "it was shocking" to describe an event or piece of information that caused surprise and often dismay. For example, "The extent of the damage /s/it+was+shocking". Ensure that the sentence provides context to understand the reason for the shock.
What are some alternatives to "it was shocking"?
Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "/s/it+was+astonishing" , "/s/it+was+appalling", or "/s/it+was+unbelievable".
Is "it was shocking" appropriate for formal writing?
While "it was shocking" is acceptable, more formal alternatives like "/s/it+was+deeply+disturbing" or "it was profoundly unsettling" might be more suitable for academic or professional contexts.
What's the difference between "it was shocking" and "it was surprising"?
"It was surprising" indicates a general sense of unexpectedness. "It was shocking" implies a stronger emotional reaction, often involving disbelief, dismay, or moral offense. The former is neutral, while the latter is more negative.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested