it was reviewed

USAGE SUMMARY

"it was reviewed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing an event or a document that was critically examined and discussed. For example: "The mayor's proposed budget was reviewed by the city council last night."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

It was reviewed by few critics upon its release, and many of those writers leaned towards a neutral rating.

Wikipedia

Its American airing brought in 3.7 million viewers and it was reviewed positively by most critics.

Wikipedia

(It was reviewed enthusiastically in Libération at the time of its release, late last year).

The New Yorker

It was reviewed by five experts (nurses and physicians) to enhance its validity.

BMC Health Services Research

It was reviewed again in the magazine's December 1989 issue by Harris and three other reviewers.

Wikipedia

"It was reviewed.

The New York Times

It was reviewed by the university's legal counsel.

The New Yorker

It was reviewed in serious newspapers, if not very favourably.

The Guardian

Nick & Toni's was a very good restaurant when it was reviewed in 1989.

The New York Times

The restaurant has changed chefs several times since it was reviewed in 1996.

The New York Times - Arts

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

It was reviewed by the Independent Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board for each participating centre.

BMC Nephrology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "it was reviewed" in passive constructions to emphasize the object or action rather than the reviewer. For instance, "The proposal was reviewed by the committee" is better when the focus is on the proposal.

Common error

Avoid overusing passive voice in your writing. While "it was reviewed" is correct, too much passive voice can make your writing sound weak and indirect. Balance it with active voice constructions for clarity and impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was reviewed" primarily functions as a passive voice construction. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. It describes an action that was performed on a subject, emphasizing that the subject underwent a review process.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

36%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "it was reviewed" is a common and grammatically sound passive voice construction used to indicate that something has undergone examination and assessment. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and appropriate for use in diverse contexts, particularly in news, scientific, and general writing. While versatile, it's important to use passive voice judiciously to maintain clarity and impact in your writing. Alternatives like "it was examined" or "it was assessed" can provide nuanced meanings depending on the specific context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was assessed

Highlights the evaluation and judgment aspect.

it was evaluated

Similar to assessed, but often implies a more formal process.

it was examined

Emphasizes a close and careful inspection.

it was inspected

Suggests a practical, hands-on assessment.

it was checked

Implies a verification process for accuracy or completeness.

it underwent scrutiny

Focuses on a detailed and critical examination.

it was analyzed

Focuses on breaking down something into its components for examination.

it was audited

Specifically refers to a financial or procedural review.

it was investigated

Suggests a more in-depth inquiry, often into potential issues.

it was considered

Implies a thoughtful reflection rather than a formal review.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "it was reviewed" to sound more active?

Instead of "it was reviewed", you can use phrases like "the committee reviewed it", "experts assessed it", or "the team evaluated it". This shifts the focus to the actors performing the review.

What's the difference between "it was reviewed" and "it was examined"?

"It was reviewed" implies a comprehensive assessment, considering various aspects. "It was examined" focuses more on a detailed inspection of specific elements. Depending on the context, "it was examined" might be more appropriate if you're highlighting a close inspection.

When is it better to use "it was reviewed" over "it was assessed"?

"It was reviewed" is generally used when something is being looked at for approval or general understanding. "It was assessed" /s/it+was+assessed/ is more common when determining the value or quality of something. The choice depends on whether the goal is evaluation or simply examination.

Is "it was reviewed by" grammatically correct?

Yes, "it was reviewed by" is grammatically correct and indicates who performed the review. For example, "The manuscript was reviewed by experts in the field".