it was resulted

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was resulted" is not correct in written English.
The correct form would typically be "it resulted" or "it was a result." Example: "After much analysis, it resulted in a significant improvement in our process."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

It was resulted that the resonance frequencies were related to the fluid-flow velocity.

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Physics

In modeling of CV and SR by ANFIS, it was resulted that the proposed method has superiority in prediction of them in the ranges of factors beyond the training condition.

Journal of Manufacturing Processes

It was resulted that the higher rotation speed, the longer time of rotation, and the slower cooling rate, the smaller the equivalent diameter and the roundness of primary particle were.

Journal of Materials Processing Technology

Also, it was resulted in increasing of apparent total number of binding site (NT) of MIPs from 18.32 mg g−1 by TRP to 26.07 mg g−1 by RAFT.

Polymer

His monumental, world-historical vita aside, Douglass's faith, much abused as it was, resulted in his inability to understand the extent to which the United States was a racial republic (Frederickson 2002).

SEP

It was resulted that pyrolysis of the primary biorefinery wastes brings many benefits: it increases the number of the biorefinery products to 5 by shifting from a mono to multi-product pathway, creates an additional economic benefit of 4470€ha−11 and avoids 355 kg CO2/t on dry pomace basis.

Journal of Cleaner Production

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

He said it was resulting in "bottlenecks" for businesses.

BBC

It's resulted in some witty responses.

Independent

It is results.

Independent

It's results.

The New York Times

"At the end of the day, it's results that are the most important thing.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In academic writing, consider using "it was a result of" or "the outcome was" for a more formal and precise tone. This helps clearly establish cause-and-effect relationships.

Common error

Avoid using the passive construction "it was resulted" as it is grammatically awkward. Instead, rephrase to use active voice or more direct phrasing to enhance clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was resulted" functions as a passive construction attempting to describe a cause-and-effect relationship. However, Ludwig AI identifies this phrasing as grammatically incorrect, suggesting it should be replaced with a more direct active voice or a different sentence structure.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it was resulted" is generally considered grammatically incorrect and Ludwig AI confirms this. While it appears in some scientific texts, it's best replaced with more direct and grammatically sound alternatives like "it resulted" or "it was a result of". Choosing clearer phrasing enhances the professionalism and readability of your writing, particularly in formal or scientific contexts. Opting for alternatives not only improves grammatical correctness but also strengthens the clarity and impact of your message.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it resulted

This is a direct and active voice alternative, removing the unnecessary passive construction.

it was a result of

This restructures the sentence to emphasize the outcome as a consequence of something else.

it stemmed from

This suggests that the outcome originated or developed from a specific source or cause.

it derived from

Similar to 'stemmed from', this indicates that the outcome was obtained or developed from something else.

it originated in

This focuses on the origin or starting point of the outcome.

the outcome was

This is a more formal way to state the result, often used in scientific or technical writing.

the effect was

This highlights the consequence or impact of a particular action or event.

the consequence was

Similar to 'the effect was', this emphasizes the result as a direct consequence.

it led to

This implies that the outcome was a direct consequence or progression from a previous action or event.

it produced

This highlights the action of generating or creating the outcome.

FAQs

What's a more grammatically correct way to say "it was resulted"?

Instead of using the phrase "it was resulted", it's better to say "it resulted" or "it was a result of". These alternatives are grammatically sound and convey the intended meaning more clearly.

Is "it was resulted" ever considered correct in formal writing?

No, "it was resulted" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in formal writing. It's best to use alternative phrases like "it resulted" or "the outcome was" to maintain a professional tone.

How can I avoid using "it was resulted" in my writing?

To avoid using "it was resulted", focus on active voice constructions. For example, instead of "it was resulted in a change", try "it led to a change" or "it produced a change". These are more direct and easier to understand.

What are some alternatives to "it was resulted" in scientific writing?

In scientific writing, you can replace "it was resulted" with phrases like "it stemmed from", "it derived from", or "the findings indicated". These alternatives offer greater precision and clarity.