Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
it was reported in
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "it was reported in" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referencing information or findings that have been published in a specific source, such as a report, article, or study. Example: "It was reported in the latest journal that climate change is accelerating at an unprecedented rate."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
It was reported in spring, while its minimum average value was 34.5 μg/L.
Science
Its minimum average result was 2.8 μg/L, it was reported in winter (Fig. 7).
Science
Its minimum average result was 3.3 μg/L, it was reported in autumn (Fig. 6).
Science
"It was reported in Vogue".
News & Media
It was reported in the media, too.
News & Media
Bishop Murphy's action forbidding it was reported in Newsday yesterday.
News & Media
It was reported in a scientific journal two years later.
News & Media
The Pentagon audit was concluded last week, it was reported in the US press last night.
News & Media
The debate has heated up since it was reported in April in The Brooklyn Heights Press.
News & Media
It must be true, it was reported in the Guardian this summer.
News & Media
It was reported in June that Athersys was close to a licensing deal.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "it was reported in", ensure that the source you are citing is credible and relevant to your topic. This strengthens the validity of your statement.
Common error
While "it was reported in" is grammatically correct, overuse can lead to passive voice. Consider using active constructions like "[Source] reported that..." for a more direct and engaging writing style.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "it was reported in" functions as an introductory phrase to attribute information to a specific source. Ludwig examples showcase its use across diverse contexts, from scientific publications to news articles, effectively signaling the origin of the information being presented. This conforms with the AI grammatical assessment.
Frequent in
News & Media
64%
Science
34%
Wiki
2%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "it was reported in" is a grammatically correct and very common way to introduce information from a specific source. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, and examples show it is frequently used in "News & Media" and scientific contexts. While effective, avoid overusing passive voice and always cite your sources properly. Consider using alternatives like "according to" or "it was mentioned in" to add variety to your writing and always make sure to cite credible sources to support your statements.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
it was mentioned in
Replaces "reported" with "mentioned", softening the emphasis on the formality of the information's origin.
it was noted in
Substitutes "reported" with "noted", suggesting a more observational or recorded context.
it was indicated in
Uses "indicated" instead of "reported", implying that the information was suggested or pointed out.
it was stated in
Replaces "reported" with "stated", emphasizing a formal declaration or assertion.
it was disclosed in
Uses "disclosed" to suggest that the information was previously private or unknown.
according to
Provides a direct attribution to a source, simplifying the phrasing.
as reported by
Highlights the reporting entity, shifting focus to the source's role.
sources indicate that
Reverses the structure, placing emphasis on multiple sources rather than a single report.
the source revealed that
Replaces "it was reported in" with a more active voice, attributing the revelation directly to a source.
the publication announced
Specifies the type of source (publication) and uses "announced" to convey the act of making something publicly known.
FAQs
How do I properly cite information introduced with "it was reported in"?
After using "it was reported in [source]", follow standard citation practices for your chosen style (MLA, APA, Chicago). This typically involves including an in-text citation and a full entry in your bibliography or works cited list.
What can I say instead of "it was reported in"?
You can use alternatives like "it was mentioned in", "it was noted in", or "according to" depending on the context.
Is it better to use active or passive voice when introducing reported information?
While "it was reported in" (passive) is grammatically correct, using active voice (e.g., "The New York Times reported...") can make your writing more direct and engaging. The best choice depends on your desired emphasis and the overall tone of your writing.
Can I use "it was reported in" for informal sources like social media?
While grammatically correct, using "it was reported in" for informal sources might seem overly formal. Consider using phrases like "according to" or "[source] said that" for social media or less formal contexts.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested