Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

it was reported in

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was reported in" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referencing information or findings that have been published in a specific source, such as a report, article, or study. Example: "It was reported in the latest journal that climate change is accelerating at an unprecedented rate."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

It was reported in spring, while its minimum average value was 34.5 μg/L.

Its minimum average result was 2.8 μg/L, it was reported in winter (Fig. 7).

Its minimum average result was 3.3 μg/L, it was reported in autumn (Fig. 6).

"It was reported in Vogue".

News & Media

The Guardian

It was reported in the media, too.

Bishop Murphy's action forbidding it was reported in Newsday yesterday.

News & Media

The New York Times

It was reported in a scientific journal two years later.

News & Media

The Guardian

The Pentagon audit was concluded last week, it was reported in the US press last night.

The debate has heated up since it was reported in April in The Brooklyn Heights Press.

News & Media

The New York Times

It must be true, it was reported in the Guardian this summer.

It was reported in June that Athersys was close to a licensing deal.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it was reported in", ensure that the source you are citing is credible and relevant to your topic. This strengthens the validity of your statement.

Common error

While "it was reported in" is grammatically correct, overuse can lead to passive voice. Consider using active constructions like "[Source] reported that..." for a more direct and engaging writing style.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was reported in" functions as an introductory phrase to attribute information to a specific source. Ludwig examples showcase its use across diverse contexts, from scientific publications to news articles, effectively signaling the origin of the information being presented. This conforms with the AI grammatical assessment.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

64%

Science

34%

Wiki

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it was reported in" is a grammatically correct and very common way to introduce information from a specific source. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, and examples show it is frequently used in "News & Media" and scientific contexts. While effective, avoid overusing passive voice and always cite your sources properly. Consider using alternatives like "according to" or "it was mentioned in" to add variety to your writing and always make sure to cite credible sources to support your statements.

FAQs

How do I properly cite information introduced with "it was reported in"?

After using "it was reported in [source]", follow standard citation practices for your chosen style (MLA, APA, Chicago). This typically involves including an in-text citation and a full entry in your bibliography or works cited list.

What can I say instead of "it was reported in"?

You can use alternatives like "it was mentioned in", "it was noted in", or "according to" depending on the context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when introducing reported information?

While "it was reported in" (passive) is grammatically correct, using active voice (e.g., "The New York Times reported...") can make your writing more direct and engaging. The best choice depends on your desired emphasis and the overall tone of your writing.

Can I use "it was reported in" for informal sources like social media?

While grammatically correct, using "it was reported in" for informal sources might seem overly formal. Consider using phrases like "according to" or "[source] said that" for social media or less formal contexts.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: