Sentence examples for it was prejudicial from inspiring English sources

It also ruled it was prejudicial to try the two together.

They argued it was prejudicial to the defense to have Mr. Malvo brought before the jury wearing a prison jumpsuit, escorted by armed guards.

"Being blind", he wrote, "how did she know she was the wrong sex?" When Trans Media Watch complained to the Sun about the remark, the paper accepted that it was tasteless but denied that it was prejudicial or pejorative.

In July 2008, the Ministry of Home Affairs banned the book, published in 2005 by Sisters in Islam, a Malaysian nongovernmental organization, on the grounds that it was "prejudicial to public order" and that it could confuse Muslims, particularly Muslim women.

The claim, from ex-Galleon employee and government witness Adam Smith, emerged in court filings in the biggest Wall Street insider trading case in a generation, with the defense asking the judge to bar that portion of his expected testimony to the jury because it was prejudicial.

intrusion-tolerant replication, with f>0, improves (mathcal{R}) for small MT, but for small ratios f/n it is prejudicial for large MT; rejuvenation cannot bring benefits before its first application, but it reduces the long-term degradation effects on dependability, by periodically bringing the system back to its initial overall state (i.e., with all nodes healthy see (20) in the Appendix).

The manifesto does not say it is prejudicial to challenge belief systems.

They will retain the power to order the government to disclose material, or to remove it entirely from the courtroom because it is prejudicial or not national security-sensitive at all.

Thus, judges' decisions to exclude evidence on the basis that it is prejudicial are often arbitrary, as Laudan shows by looking at actual cases.

It is monopolar insofar as deity is characterized by only one side of each pair of contrasts; it is prejudicial insofar as it holds to the invidious nature of the contrasts.

The Judiciary Committee is on track to perpetuate the debate-stifling canard that it's prejudicial for a nominee to discuss constitutional issues in any specificity during the nomination process and thus taboo.