it was not restricted

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was not restricted" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something was not limited or confined in any way. Example: "The access to the library was not restricted, allowing everyone to enter freely."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

"We're pleased; we got access; it was not restricted".

The New York Times

The Appeals Court judges restricted their ruling to finding that DRIPA was unlawful because it was not restricted to solely fighting serious crime; and because access to the data was not subject to a review by a court or independent administrative authority.

TechCrunch

It was not restricted to those involving nuclear weapons.

Wikipedia

It was not restricted to those involving nuclear weapons, but also investigated chemical and biological weapons, and the means to deliver them.

Wikipedia

In his later works, he tried to demonstrate the existence of God and of the divine law; the Sharia, as he conceived it, was not restricted to the sphere of the Islamic law alone.

Wikipedia

Since improved expression was consistent in HEK293T, CHO and insect cells, it was not restricted to distinct mammalian cell systems.

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

Feelings were in her work but it wasn't restricted to feelings.

The Guardian - Books

Chinese foot binding lasted for nearly a millennium, and it wasn't restricted to the leisure classes: many peasants subjected their daughters to the practice.

The New Yorker

What was great about those events were that they were predominantly house and techno, but not everyone there even cared about that, it wasn't restricted to a certain demographic, everyone just wanted a good party.

Vice

It is not restricted to whites only".

The Guardian

It is not restricted to the Arab world.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it was not restricted", ensure the subject 'it' is clearly defined in the preceding context to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "it was not restricted" without a clear antecedent for 'it'. Ensure the reader understands what is being described as unrestricted. For example, instead of saying "It was not restricted", specify "Access to the building was not restricted."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was not restricted" functions as a statement indicating the absence of limitations or constraints. As shown in Ludwig, this phrase commonly clarifies that something is accessible, open, or free from specific regulations.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Science

39%

Wiki

11%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it was not restricted" serves to denote the absence of limitations or constraints. Ludwig AI confirms it is grammatically sound and usable across a variety of contexts, predominantly in news, scientific writing, and general informational content. While perfectly acceptable, more formal alternatives exist for professional settings. When employing the phrase, clarity is paramount, ensuring that the 'it' is clearly defined. Prominent sources like The New York Times and The Guardian demonstrate its usage, further solidifying its place in the English language.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was unrestricted

This alternative uses a single word to convey the absence of restrictions, making it more concise.

there were no restrictions on it

This rephrases the original statement to emphasize the absence of any restrictions.

it was not limited

This phrase uses a different synonym for "restricted", focusing on the absence of limitations.

it was unconstrained

This alternative is more formal, highlighting the lack of imposed boundaries.

it was not subject to limitations

This phrase is more verbose and formal, explicitly stating the absence of limitations.

it was open

This suggests accessibility and lack of barriers, differing slightly in connotation from strict restriction.

it wasn't confined

This focuses on the lack of confinement or enclosure, suggesting a broader scope.

it was free

This emphasizes the absence of constraints or controls, focusing on liberty.

it was not exclusive

This emphasizes that something wasn't limited to a specific group or purpose.

it was accessible to all

This alternative focuses on the inclusivity and open availability of something.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "it was not restricted" for variety?

You can use alternatives like "it was unrestricted", "it was not limited", or "there were no restrictions on it" depending on the context.

Is "it was not restricted" formal or informal?

The phrase "it was not restricted" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts. However, for a more formal tone, you might consider using alternatives such as "it was unconstrained" or "it was not subject to limitations".

What does "it was not restricted" mean?

The phrase "it was not restricted" means that something was free from limitations, constraints, or controls. It implies that there were no barriers or conditions imposed on the subject in question.

Can I use "it is not restricted" instead of "it was not restricted"?

Yes, you can use "it is not restricted", but the choice depends on the tense required by the context. "It was not restricted" refers to something in the past, while "it is not restricted" refers to the present.