it was not established

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was not established" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that something was not proven or confirmed. Example: In the court case, it was not established beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty of the crime.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

36 human-written examples

It was not established by the citizens themselves".

The New York Times

It existed between 1949 and 1967; it was not established after the 1967 war.

The New York Times

It was not established that the information he downloaded was classified.

The New York Times

It was not established to serve or protect the Palestinians, but to act as a bantustan police force for Israel.

The Guardian - Opinion

The park was authorized in 1934, but, because of difficulties acquiring land, it was not established until 1947.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Maxillofacial surgery is a relatively young speciality of medicine and it was not established as an organized specialty until the second half of the 20th century.

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

24 human-written examples

Although it wasn't established definitively whether the drug killed her, officers continue to investigate the possibility.

Vice

But it wasn't established by the Obama administration, it existed long before their efforts to support survivors.

HuffPost

"It is not established that Mr Lee deliberately lost a match when he could and should have won it.

The Guardian - Sport

"It is not established that you no longer hold those extremist jihadist and Islamic State views," he said.

The Guardian

Despite many efforts, it is not established whether betaretroviruses, exo- or endogenous, are involved in the etiology of breast cancer, or other cancer diseases, in humans.

Journal of Virological Methods

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "it was not established" when you want to indicate that something has not been proven or confirmed definitively, often in contexts where proof or confirmation is expected.

Common error

Avoid overuse of passive constructions like "it was not established". While grammatically correct, excessive use can make your writing sound weak. Consider rephrasing to highlight the actor or entity responsible for the lack of establishment, for example: "researchers failed to establish."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was not established" functions as a statement indicating a lack of confirmation, proof, or determination regarding a particular fact or claim. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Science

41%

Encyclopedias

12%

Less common in

Wiki

6%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "it was not established" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate a lack of proof or confirmation. As shown by Ludwig, it appears frequently in news, science, and encyclopedia articles, reflecting a neutral to formal register. When using this phrase, ensure the context requires a clear statement of uncertainty or absence of evidence. While useful, avoid overusing the passive voice and consider alternative phrasing to maintain a dynamic and clear writing style. The phrase is best applied when conveying that something hasn't been definitively proven or validated, as opposed to being disproven.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it wasn't proven

This alternative focuses specifically on the lack of demonstrable proof.

it wasn't confirmed

This highlights the absence of official verification or validation.

it wasn't determined

This implies that a decision or conclusion was not reached.

it wasn't demonstrated

This indicates a failure to show or exhibit something clearly.

it remained unproven

This suggests the fact in question never achieved a proven state.

it wasn't ascertained

This highlights that the fact was not definitely discovered or found out.

it wasn't verified

This means that there was no validation of something's truth.

it was not shown

This suggests a lack of evidence presented or displayed.

the evidence was inconclusive

This denotes that the evidence available didn't lead to a definite result.

the link was not substantiated

The bond or connection lacks firm evidence to support it.

FAQs

How can I use "it was not established" in a sentence?

You can use "it was not established" to indicate a lack of proof or confirmation. For example, "It was not established whether the new policy would improve efficiency."

What are some alternatives to "it was not established"?

Alternatives include phrases like "it wasn't proven", "it wasn't confirmed", or "it wasn't determined", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "it was not established" or "it is not established"?

The choice between "it was not established" and "it is not established" depends on the time frame you're referring to. Use "it was not established" for something that wasn't established in the past, and "it is not established" for something that remains unestablished in the present.

What's the difference between "it was not established" and "it was disproven"?

"It was not established" means that something hasn't been proven true, whereas "it was disproven" means that something has been proven false. They are opposite in meaning.